What is the just-world hypothesis?

Quesiton : What is the just-world hypothesis?

Answer: person's knowledge about the sequence of events in a specific setting

What is the just-world hypothesis? The just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the cognitive bias that a person's actions are inherently inclined to bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person to the end of all noble actions being eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished. In other words the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to—or expect consequences as the result … Mon Mar 25 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0530 (IST) · Just-World Theory and Victim-Blaming. The just-world theory posits that when people do fall victim to misfortune others tend to look for things that might explain their circumstances . In other words people have an automatic tendency to look for something or someone to blame for unfortunate events. The just world hypothesis describes a cognitive bias in which people believe that the world they live in is one in which actions have appropriate and predictable consequences. Sat Mar 04 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0530 (IST) · The just-world hypothesis is the assumption that a person's actions are inherently inclined to bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person to the end of all noble actions being ... Psychology Definition of JUST-WORLD HYPOTHESIS : It was postulated by Canadian psychologist Melvin J Lerner 1929 The need to see victims as the recipients of their just deserts can be explained by what psychologists call the Just World Hypothesis . According to the hypothesis people have a strong desire or need to believe that the world is an orderly predictable and just place where people get what they deserve. Thu Jul 28 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0530 (IST) · The just world hypothesis is a part of many traditional belief systems across a huge variety of cultures and is a perennial basis for storytelling . It may represent an attempt to project theory of mind—the way in which a person predicts the motivations and actions of another person—onto the world itself as if the world were like a person in this respect.