[Answer] If VX = WZ = 40 cm and m∠ZVX = m∠XWZ = 22° can ΔVZX and ΔWXZ be proven congruent by SAS? Why or why not?

Answer: A/C/D

Most relevant text from all around the web:

If VX = WZ = 40 cm and m∠ZVX = m∠XWZ = 22° can ΔVZX and ΔWXZ be proven congruent by SAS? Why or why not? If VX = WZ = 40 cm and m∠ZVX = m∠XWZ = 22° can ΔVZX and ΔWXZ be proven congruent by SAS? Why or why not ? A/C/D. The proof that ΔACB ≅ ΔECD is shown. Given: AE and DB bisect each other at C. Prove: ΔACB ≅ ΔECD What is the missing statement in the proof? A/B/C. If VX = WZ = 40 cm and m∠ZVX = m∠XWZ = 22° can ΔVZX and ΔWXZ be proven congruent by SAS? Why or why not ? No there is not enough information given. Which of these triangle pairs can be mapped to each other using a single translation? d. In the diagram KL ≅ NR and JL ≅ MR. What additional information is needed to show ΔJKL ... If VX = WZ = 40 cm and m∠ZVX = m∠XWZ = 22° can ΔVZX and ΔWXZ be proven congruent by SAS? Why or why not ? Yes along with the given information ZX ≅ ZX by the reflexive property. If VX = WZ = 40 cm and m∠ZVX = m∠XWZ = 22° can ΔVZX and ΔWXZ be proven congruent by SAS? Why or why not ? Yes along with the given information ZX ≅ ZX by the reflexive property. Yes the triangles are both obtuse. No the sides of the triangles intersect. No there...

Disclaimer: 

Our tool is still learning and trying its best to find the correct answer to your question. Now its your turn, "The more we share The more we have". Comment any other details to improve the description, we will update answer while you visit us next time...Kindly check our comments section, Sometimes our tool may wrong but not our users.

Are We Wrong To Think We're Right? Then Give Right Answer Below As Comment