[Answer] Taxation without representation was tyranny.?????

Answer: 6. How was the Stamp Act related to the French and Indian War?

Most relevant text from all around the web:

Taxation without representation was tyranny.????? Taxation Without Representation - Investopedia No taxation without representation - American Revoluntionary ... Taxation Without Representation Definition & Example TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION IS TYRANNY . There was no disagreement in Britain or America about the basic truth of this idea first used by John Hampden in 1637 against Charles I but by the middle of the eighteenth century " representation " had come to mean different things on opposite sides of the Atlantic. The phrase had been used for more than a generation in Ireland. By 1765 the term was in use in Boston and local politician James Otis was most famously associated with the phrase "taxation without representation is tyranny." In the course of the Revolutionary era (1750–1783) many arguments were pursued that sought to resolve the dispute surrounding Parliamentary sovereignty taxation self-governance and representation. Taxation without representation is tyranny A slogan of the Revolutionary War and the years before. The colonists were not allowed to choose representatives to parliament in London which passed the laws under which they were taxed. Sat Jul 25 2020 · The phrase taxation without representation describes a populace that is required to pay taxes to a government authority without h...

Disclaimer: 

Our tool is still learning and trying its best to find the correct answer to your question. Now its your turn, "The more we share The more we have". Comment any other details to improve the description, we will update answer while you visit us next time...Kindly check our comments section, Sometimes our tool may wrong but not our users.

Are We Wrong To Think We're Right? Then Give Right Answer Below As Comment